As a member of Amnesty International, I receive frequent e-mail updates from the global human rights organization, mostly to collect signatories in championing the causes of others.
One recent e-mail is about the Darfur Crisis in Sudan. Amnesty International is urging the United Nations to intervene by sending peacekeepers to control the alarming situation.
After an overview discussion, John and I agreed the Darfur Crisis is beyond the United Nations’ control.
In John‘s words, the United Nations are “peacekeepers�, not “peacemakers�. Hence, they will only intervene when all parties involved agrees to ceasefire and make peace.
The Darfur Crisis is between black African farmers and Arab nomads who herd livestock. Both are fighting over the furtile grounds of Sudan. The Arab government bomb the homes of black Africans, in an attempt to drive the locals out of the country, replacing them with Arab families.
This is an internal crisis that we’re talking about. Without the agreement of the Arab government to ceasefire and make peace, the United Nations are not welcomed to intervene. It is also America’s policy to only be involved in cases where they have something to gain.
To explain this, let us go back to the civil crisis in Somalia . Video footages of Somalis in starvation was aired over CNN in 1991, causing Americans to pressurize their government for humanitarian intervention. The United States granted it’s citizens’ wish, by getting involved even though Somalia had no economic significance.
However, a major backlash broke out when peacekeepers were attacked by civilians while unarmed and offloading food. The following year, United Nation helicopters were shot down while flying over the city. In an attempt to secure the crash site, American soldiers were cornered by people they were intending to save. In John’s words, it “became the bloodiest firefight since the Vietnam War.�
In the aftermath, bodies of slain American soldiers were dragged through the streets of Mogadishu by jeering mobs. The traumatic scene was captured on video and aired over CNN. Americans were shocked that by being kind to intervene, their men were attacked and killed. With such, President Clinton withdrew troops from Somalia. Without the backing of the United States, the U. N. mission collapsed.
Since then, it has become a policy of the United Nations to only intervene when there is something to gain, because American lives are at risk in each deployment. Besides, such missions are not cheap. As stated in a report, the Somali intervention cost $42,931,700 nett, but it was not appreciated by the people of Somalia.